Acknowledging the work of others
Topic: Reviewing the history of plagiarism
What do you think...
To what extent is the shame of plagiarism based on values other than economic values?
Read this account of the emergence of interest in plagiarism in the Western European tradition:
“I will begin by drawing a parallel between the historical process of land enclosure that occurred in England from the fifteenth to the nineteenth centuries [and] the development and spread of print and suggest thereby that both expressed new concepts of economics and of the self. Correlate developments in private land ownership, copyright, and the rise of the author, along with the concept of plagiarism, reveal that commodification (the idea that everything can be sold on an open market) is the ideology that unites all these apparently disparate developments, and affects the way we conceptualize what we do in our classrooms, what we expect from our students, and what they produce in response to our expectations.” (p.4)
Scurrah., W.L. (2001, March). Plagiarism, enclosure, and the commons of the mind. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Denver, Colorado. Retrieved November 20, 2007 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED451570&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED451570* |
Focus questions
- Could your own values about originality and plagiarism be summed up as economic values? Why or why not?
- What other aspects of the history of plagiarism might bear consideration?
- How might you use this analysis of plagiarism’s foundations to improve student or staff attitudes and behaviours?
* Used with the author's permission.

